Use Cases
FMCG BrandMeasurement & ROIBuyer · CMO / CFO

Proving advertising ROI to the CFO — in finance language.

Closed-loop sales proof. Budget defended, then grown.

100% (default)
Campaigns with closed-loop measurement
2.5–5.0x
ROAS (product level)
+15–25% projected
MMM budget optimisation
Scenario

The situation.

The CFO is questioning the €8M annual retail advertising budget for an established FMCG brand. "Does this actually sell more product, or is it a vanity line item?" Marketing has been presenting reach and frequency. The CFO wants incremental revenue and ROI in finance language. One more "50M users, 170M impressions" deck will trigger a budget cut.

The problem without Qommerce

Why today fails.

The ad platform reports impressions, CPM, CTR and video views. The retail data team reports quarterly market share. Nobody connects them. Marketing cannot prove that the €8M budget generated a single incremental product sold. The CFO is right to question it. Marketing is defending the budget with faith, not evidence.

The Qommerce workflow

How it runs end-to-end.

A step-by-step walkthrough of what happens inside the platform — and the value delivered at each step.

  1. 01

    Campaign setup with measurement built-in

    Every Qommerce campaign automatically includes closed-loop measurement. No separate vendor, no manual data matching, no three-month delay. When targeting selects postcodes, matched control postcodes are constructed automatically.

    Value delivered

    Measurement is default, not an add-on. No extra cost, no extra setup.

  2. 02

    Closed-loop attribution — post-campaign

    A clean room matches exposure data to retailer purchase transactions and reports per channel: CTV €1.2M spend → 180K incremental units → €540K revenue → 3.4x ROAS (product) / 4.8x (brand) → €1.85 cost per unit. DOOH €800K → 145K units → 4.1x / €1.52 per unit. Display €600K → 62K units → 2.3x / €2.68 per unit. Total €2.6M → 387K units → 3.4x ROAS → €1.86 per unit.

    Value delivered

    The CFO sees exactly how many products each channel sold and what each one cost — products, not impressions.

  3. 03

    Marketing Mix Modelling — all channels

    MMM ingests spend from every channel — offline (TV, print, OOH), Qommerce campaigns, and other DSPs (TTD, DV360) — alongside seasonality, weather, competitive activity, price and distribution changes, and macro conditions. Of the €8M total spend, €5.2M generated measurable incremental sales and €2.1M sat in diminishing-return channels. Optimal reallocation: shift €600K from linear TV to CTV and €400K from display to DOOH near high-growth postcodes — projected +18% incremental revenue at the same total budget.

    Value delivered

    Not just "did advertising work?" — "how should we reallocate for maximum return?" in CFO language.

  4. 04

    The board presentation

    The CMO presents: every €1 in CTV generated €3.40 in incremental retail sales, validated by exposure-to-transaction matching; retail media generated 387K incremental units at €1.86 per unit; 23% of buyers in exposed postcodes were new-to-brand; MMM recommends reallocating €1M from underperforming to high-return channels for a projected +18% with zero additional budget. The CFO does not cut the budget. The CFO grows it.

    Value delivered

    Marketing transforms from a cost centre to a provable growth driver.

Expected outcomes

Benchmark ranges.

Drawn from the platform's capabilities. Use as projections, not guarantees.

Campaigns with closed-loop measurement
100% (default)
ROAS (product level)
2.5–5.0x
MMM budget optimisation
+15–25% projected
Time from campaign end to sales report
2–3 weeks
Sales talk track

The question, the bridge, the proof.

Discovery

When the CFO asks "does our advertising actually sell more product?" — what do you show them today?

Bridge

What if every campaign automatically came with a report showing incremental units sold, cost per unit, and ROAS at the product level — validated by matching ad exposure to actual retailer purchase data?

Let's talk

Ready to close the execution gap?